Cage rearing of chickens

The caging of laying hens is not yet a thing of the past. It is true that battery cages have been banned in Germany since 2010. However, keeping in small group cages is still permitted in Germany until 2026, with exceptions even until 2029.

In Germany, 2.3 million hens still live in cages. Across the EU, there are almost 170 million laying hens that eke out their lives in the charmless environment of a cage1. Globally, caging is still by far the most widespread form of husbandry2.

Portät einer Legehenne in Käfighaltung - Credit: Andrew Skowron / Open Cages

Portrait of a laying hen in a cage – Credit: Andrew Skowron / Open Cages

Neither the conventional nor the enriched cage offers the animals an environment in which they can develop freely. Positive experiences, physical integrity, and the opportunity to act out natural behaviors are rare.

What does cage rearing mean for chickens?

Around 43.2 million laying hens live in Germany. The majority live in floor or free-range systems. Five percent, no less than 2.3 million animals, are still kept in enriched cages, so-called small group housing.3

The hens live in a cage tightly packed in a very small space. There is hardly any free space. The animals are surrounded either by their conspecifics or the cage wall. Instead of earth, plants and sun, their world consists of metal and plastic.

Käfighaltung Hühner
Hennen in einem Legebetrieb in Italien strecken ihre Köpfe durch die Käfiggitter, um an ihr Essen zu kommen. Jeder Stall auf dieser Farm hat 4 Stockwerke mit tausenden von Hennen, die in Käfigbatterien gesperrt sind. (Italien) - Credit: [Stefano Belacchi / Essere Animali] / We Animals Media

Hens at a laying farm in Italy poke their heads through the cage bars to get to their food. Each barn on this farm has 4 floors with thousands of hens locked in battery cages. (Italy) – Credit: [Stefano Belacchi / Essere Animali] / We Animals Media

Like their ancestors, the Bankiva chickens, laying hens have a high need for activity. To live out their basic needs, first and foremost their natural behaviors, is predominantly denied or severely restricted in the cage. These include:

  • Moving around5
  • Foraging
  • Picking and scratching
  • Nesting
  • Perching
  • Hiding
  • Exerting comfort behavior6

Eggs versus products containing eggs

13 billion eggs were produced in Germany in 20217. The origin of the eggs is distributed as follows:

  • 8,1 billion eggs from barn farming
  • 2.5 billion free range eggs
  • 1.7 billion eggs from organic production
  • 718 million eggs from cage farming8

 

Eier in der Auffangvorrichtung an einem Käfig - Credit: Andrew Skowron / Open Cages

Eggs in the collector on a cage – Credit: Andrew Skowron / Open Cages

Since 2004, fresh eggs traded in the EU must be labeled according to origin and husbandry.

  • 0 = Organic production
  • 1 = Free-range
  • 2 = Floor husbandry
  • 3 = Cage-rearing

This labeling has led to consumers buying fewer eggs from caged hens. In 2008, 60 percent of eggs still came from caged hens; by 2021, this figure had fallen to just seven percent10.

The labeling requirement does not apply to eggs that have already been processed. Thus, eggs from battery cages are still used in restaurants as well as in products offered in stores, such as pasta or pastries. Easter eggs that have already been cooked and colored also do not have to be labeled11.

Beine von zwei Hühnern und ein beschmutztes Ei in einem Käfig - Credit: Andrew Skowron / Open Cages

Legs of two chickens and a dirty egg in a cage – Credit: Andrew Skowron / Open Cages

Former Agriculture Minister Julia Klöckner advocated mandatory EU-wide labeling of the farming method used for processed eggs12. So far, the European Union has not complied with this proposal13.

Laying batteries

Keeping laying hens in battery cages is the most intensive and economical form of husbandry14. Four to five animals live crowded together in one cage. Each hen has just 550 cm² of space. That is less than a Din A4 sheet.

In addition to the lack of space, there is no structuring of the cage and the floor consists of wire mesh. The feed is the only manipulable material in the conventional cage.16

The chickens can not live out natural behaviors in this barren environment. Sand bathing, stretching extensively and resting on elevated places is impossible. Because of this, the animals experience physical and psychological stress.17

Eine neugierige Legehenne in einem Käfig in einer Massentierhaltung. (Australien) - Credit: [Jo-Anne McArthur] / We Animals Media

A curious laying hen in a cage in a factory farm. (Australia) – Credit: [Jo-Anne McArthur] / We Animals Media

In the always same rut in a confined space, it is impossible for the chickens to have positive experiences. As a result, they do not feel positive emotions such as joy and curiosity.18

The lack of movement in the cages leads to osteoporosis and fatty liver disease. This results in broken bones and ruptured livers, which lead to severe chronic pain. Because the animals stand on wire mesh all day, they often develop foot injuries.19

Farm Sanctuary was co-founded by Gene Baur and Lorri Houston in 1986 when they rescued Hilda, their first sheep. Farm Sanctuary was the first sanctuary of its kind, focusing wholly on rescuing and advocating for animals farmed for food. As of 2021, Farm Sanctuary’s website states that its mission is “[To] pursue bold solutions to end animal agriculture and foster just and compassionate vegan living.” Today, they have sanctuaries in New York and California and at any given time are caring for almost 1,000 animals. The sanctuaries attract thousands of visitors, interns, and volunteers each year. The New York shelter boasts 275 acres of rolling pastures, forests, an education centre, and accommodation for guests, and the Southern California shelter has 26 acres. Educational events about animals are held at each sanctuary throughout the year. Learn more at https://www.farmsanctuary.org.

Toenails far too long from standing on cage floor. (New York, USA) – Credit: [Jo-Anne McArthur] / We Animals Media

The long road to a ban

Conventional cages originated in the USA, where they were already widely used in the 1950s. In Germany, the housing system became established in the 1970s. In 1972, 80 percent of laying hens lived in conventional cages20.

Even then, there were voices that criticized this form of husbandry. Three scientists wrote in the context of an expert opinion on the keeping of laying hens in cages for the German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Forestry that cage rearing fulfills the facts of animal cruelty to a high degree21.

Hühner und Eier in einer Legebatterie - Credit: Andrew Skowron / Open Cages

Chickens and eggs in a battery cage – Credit: Andrew Skowron / Open Cages

Further expert opinions and court rulings followed, classifying the situation of animals in cages as relevant to animal welfare. However, the Central Association of the German Poultry Industry (ZDG) was a powerful advocate of cage rearing22. Under pressure from the ZDG, the Hens Husbandry Ordinance was passed in 1987, which protected keepers from criminalization23.

In 1999, Germany repealed its ordinance on the keeping of hens and classified cage rearing as relevant to animal welfare24. In the same year, a directive sealed the EU-wide ban on conventional cages from 201225. Germany implemented this directive earlier and banned keeping in conventional cages from 201026.

Enriched cages

Compared to battery cages, enriched cages are structured with litter, nests and perches. In addition, they offer slightly more space for the chickens. The following minimum requirements for cages have applied in the EU since 2012:

  • total minimum size of 2.000 cm²
  • 750 cm² space per animal
  • A nest
  • a littered area for scratching and pecking
  • a suitable perch with at least 15 cm space per hen
  • one unrestricted feeding trough with 12 cm length per hen
  • an adequate drinking device
  • a device for shortening the claws

Close-up of a chicken in a cage – Credit: Andrew Skowron / Open Cages

For the hens, this means a “space gain” of 150 cm² per animal. That is an area of 10 by 15 centimeters, about the size of an average book. This gain in space still allows natural behaviors to a very limited extent29

In Germany, this form of enriched cages has been banned since 2021. However, the somewhat larger special form of the enriched cage, the so-called small group cage, is still allowed until 2026.30,31

Small group housing

The requirements for enriched cages in Germany are stricter than those specified in the EU Directive32

  • Minimum area: 2.5 m² (EU guidelines: 2.0 m²)
  • Minimum area per animal: 800 to 900 cm² (EU guidelines: 750 cm²)
  • Nest size per hen: 90 cm² (EU guidelines: no specifications)33
  • Scratching area per hen: 90 cm² (EU guidelines: no specifications)34

Since the specifications in Germany are minimally stricter than in the EU specification, a separate term was coined for it: small group housing35. However, the term is misleading because this type of housing is still a cage. This fact is forgotten due to the euphemistic term.

Restrictions in enriched cages

The spatial restriction and the resulting difficulty in structuring the cages in a meaningful way severely limits the behavioral possibilities of the chickens. This relates to the following behavioral complexes:36

  • Locomotion behavior
  • Personal hygiene behavior (especially sand bathing)
  • Nest oriented behavior
  • Resting behavior (especially perching)
  • Social behavior
  • Foraging and ingestion behavior
Eine Farm mit ausgestalteten Käfigen. (Schweden) - Credit: [Jo-Anne McArthur / Djurrattsalliansen] / We Animals Media

A farm with enriched cages. (Sweden) – Credit: [Jo-Anne McArthur / Djurrattsalliansen] / We Animals Media

In an enriched cage, the available space is small and the cage height is low. The perches further constrict the space. Therefore, locomotion is almost as restricted as in a conventional cage37.

Different movements require different amounts of space. Resting only takes up the space of the body’s circumference. Running, flapping and flying require far more space38. In small group housing, chickens perform space-consuming behaviors much less frequently. The cage simply offers too little space for their execution39.

Sand bathing represents an important comfort behavior in chickens40. In enriched cages and small group cages, the chickens have too little space to perform this behavior synchronously. Also the substrate is often not suitable41.

Chickens seek elevated places to sleep. There they keep a better overview in the wild and seek protection from enemies. They prefer to rest on trees several meters high42.

Eine Farm mit ausgestalteten Käfigen. (Schweden) - Credit: [Jo-Anne McArthur / Djurrattsalliansen] / We Animals Media

A farm with enriched cages. (Sweden) – Credit: [Jo-Anne McArthur / Djurrattsalliansen] / We Animals Media

In cages, perches are placed only a few centimeters above the cage floor. They do not provide a retreat, but on the contrary, encourage other chickens to peck the cloacas of the hens sitting on them43.

Research shows that not all chickens use the perches in the cage to rest at night. Some of them spend the night on the grid floor, in the nest or in the sand bath. This does not represent species-appropriate resting44.

Due to the confined space, separation into resting and activity areas is not possible. Hens resting on the low perches or on the floor are disturbed by other, active animals45.

Behavior disorder feather pecking

Feather pecking is a major problem in intensive chicken farming. The chickens peck their conspecifics or pull out their feathers and eat them. Those affected suffer pain and the ruffled feathers no longer offer them full protection.46,47

Feather pecking is not aggressive behavior, but is interpreted as misguided food acquisition behavior. Since the feed in laying hen husbandry serves only for satiation and as an energy supplier, the animals’ need for occupation remains unsatisfied48.

In einen Käfig gestopfte Hennen auf einer Legefarm. (Australien) - Credit: [Jo-Anne McArthur] / We Animals Media

Hens stuffed into a cage on a laying farm. (Australia) – Credit: [Jo-Anne McArthur] / We Animals Media

In addition to feeding, other influencing factors play a role in the development of feather pecking49:

  • Genetics
  • Rearing conditions of the pullets
  • Enclosure
  • Herd size
  • Management

Since the behavioral disorder of feather pecking occurs frequently in all types of husbandry, it can be concluded that the chickens are overwhelmed in dealing with their environment50.

How do laying hens live in other types of housing? Floor husbandry

In floor husbandry, the chickens have more space at their disposal. The environment is more complex and instead of just standing on wire flooring, at least a third of the area is littered. This allows them to perform certain behaviors51.

However, the chickens live in very large groups52. This overburdens the animals and often results in behavioral disorders such as feather pecking and cannibalism. Parasite infestation is also high, as parasites multiply quickly in the litter-feces mixture and spread more easily in large groups54.

Aviary husbandry

Aviary husbandry is a form of floor husbandry. In this system, the chickens are given access to different floors55. The chickens can reach the different levels via perches and thus access litter, water, feed and nests56.

The frequent occurrence of bone fractures is a major problem in aviary husbandry. Not only do the chickens suffer from the pain, but it also makes it harder for them to move between floors57.

Free range and organic

In these forms of husbandry, the chickens have an outdoor run at their disposal. In the open-air run, the chickens live out a large part of their behavioural repertoire. Sunlight, fresh air and changing weather conditions have a positive effect on the chickens’ health and well-being..58

In these forms of husbandry, the chickens are provided with a run. In the run, the chickens live out a large part of their behavioral repertoire. Sunlight, fresh air and changing weather conditions have a positive effect on the health and well-being of the chickens.

Obwohl die Freilandhaltung und die biologische Hühnerhaltung eine große Akzeptanz in der Gesellschaft genießen, kommt es aber auch hier zu den klassischen tierschutzrelevanten Problemen. Federpicken, Knochenbrüche, Parasitenbefall und andere Krankheitserreger sind keine Seltenheit.59,60

Comparison of the types of husbandry in Germany

Form of husbandry Caging (small group cages) Floor husbandry Free-range Organic farming
Code number on the egg 3 2 1 0
Stocking density per m2 depending on body weight between 11 and just under 13 hens 9 hens 9 hens 6 hens
Groupe size Varies depending on the size of the cage (30 to 60 animals are common)61 max. 6.000 chickens max. 6.000 chickens max. 3.000 chickens
Daylight in the stable no yes, but exceptions to daylighting in the barn are allowed by law62 yes, but exceptions to daylighting in the barn are allowed by law63 yes, but exceptions to daylighting in the barn are allowed by law64
Outdoor climate contacts (sun and fresh air) no nonly if winter garden available yes yes
Grassland outlet no no yes, 4 m² per animal yes, 4 m² per animal
Interspersed area at least 250 square centimeters per laying hen at least one third of the stable area at least one third of the stable area at least one third of the stable area
Sand bathing behavior severely limited depending on the quality and quantity of bedding in the stable Depending on the quality and quantity of bedding in the barn and the design of the outdoor area Depending on the quality and quantity of bedding in the barn and the design of the outdoor area
Foraging behavior and intake of different foods severely limited limited, somewhat better when kept with winter garden Variety possible due to outdoor area Variety possible due to outdoor area
Grain offerings not mandatory not mandatory not mandatory not mandatory
Social structures appropriate to the species (animals of different ages, chickens and roosters kept together) not mandatory not mandatory not mandatory not mandatory
Organic nesting materials not mandatory not mandatory not mandatory not mandatory
Beak trimming Permitted by law, but voluntary waiver agreement currently in effect Permitted by law, but voluntary waiver agreement currently in effect Permitted by law, but voluntary waiver agreement currently in effect Permitted by law, but voluntary waiver agreement currently in effect

Overview of cage farming worldwide

As of 2012, conventional caging was banned in the EU. The member countries switched predominantly from conventional to enriched cages.65

In 2021, 168,822,117 hens lived in cages in the EU. On average in the EU, this represents 45 percent of all laying hens. The distribution varies greatly across Europe. While in Austria cage rearing has been completely banned since 2020, in Malta 99.4 percent of hens live in cages66.

Aus Legebatterien herausschauende Hühner - Credit: Andrew Skowron / Open Cages

Chickens peeping out of battery cages – Credit: Andrew Skowron / Open Cages

In addition to Malta, Estonia and Lithuania also keep more than 80 percent of laying hens in cages. But this will soon come to an end67. Under pressure from the European Citizens’ Initiative “End the Cage Age”, the European Commission is aiming to end cage rearing by the end of 202768.

Globally, the situation is different. Alternative husbandry systems are a niche in most non-EU countries. Estimates suggest that 90 to 95 percent of all eggs produced worldwide come from caged hens69.

What type of husbandry is best for chickens?

Bankiva chickens, the wild form of domestic chickens, live in small groups in the jungles of Thailand. They belong to the same species as domestic chickens despite domestication. They have very similar needs and behavior patterns.70

Farm Sanctuary was co-founded by Gene Baur and Lorri Houston in 1986 when they rescued Hilda, their first sheep. Farm Sanctuary was the first sanctuary of its kind, focusing wholly on rescuing and advocating for animals farmed for food. As of 2021, Farm Sanctuary’s website states that its mission is “[To] pursue bold solutions to end animal agriculture and foster just and compassionate vegan living.” Today, they have sanctuaries in New York and California and at any given time are caring for almost 1,000 animals. The sanctuaries attract thousands of visitors, interns, and volunteers each year. The New York shelter boasts 275 acres of rolling pastures, forests, an education centre, and accommodation for guests, and the Southern California shelter has 26 acres. Educational events about animals are held at each sanctuary throughout the year. Learn more at https://www.farmsanctuary.org.

Hens explore nature and their new home at the “Farm Sanctuary”. – Credit: [Jo-Anne McArthur] / We Animals Media

Six to seven wild hens live together with one rooster. They spend the day mainly foraging. At night, they retreat to high trees to sleep. There, they are protected from predators. 71,72

The reality of laying hens, even in farms that go far beyond the legal requirements, is different. Instead of living with rooster and offspring, they live with hens of the same age. In the large groups, they can no longer tell their conspecifics apart.

Instead of living in the diffuse light in the thicket of the jungle, they live in the barn under artificial light. Many of them do not see natural daylight their whole lives. They have to sleep on the ground or, at best, on perches that are too low.

They are fed a high-calorie porridge, which is filling and provides sufficient energy, but does not satisfy the need for pecking and scratching. Many of them take out their frustration on conspecifics.

Gerettete Hennen auf dem Lebenshof “Frie Vinger” (Freie Flügel). (Dänemark) - Credit: [Jo-Anne McArthur / #unboundproject] / We Animals Media

Rescued hens on the life farm “Frie Vinger” (Free Wings). (Denmark) – Credit: [Jo-Anne McArthur / #unboundproject] / We Animals Media

Every chicken has the right to a life worth living without exploitation and violent death. Keeping chickens must be tailored to their needs. It must also take into account that they have individual preferences and interests.

Commercial agriculture does not meet these demands. Hens are considered a necessary means to an end in egg production. Little consideration is given to their psychological and physical well-being.

Farm Sanctuary was co-founded by Gene Baur and Lorri Houston in 1986 when they rescued Hilda, their first sheep. Farm Sanctuary was the first sanctuary of its kind, focusing wholly on rescuing and advocating for animals farmed for food. As of 2021, Farm Sanctuary’s website states that its mission is “[To] pursue bold solutions to end animal agriculture and foster just and compassionate vegan living.” Today, they have sanctuaries in New York and California and at any given time are caring for almost 1,000 animals. The sanctuaries attract thousands of visitors, interns, and volunteers each year. The New York shelter boasts 275 acres of rolling pastures, forests, an education centre, and accommodation for guests, and the Southern California shelter has 26 acres. Educational events about animals are held at each sanctuary throughout the year. Learn more at https://www.farmsanctuary.org.

(New York, USA) – Credit: [Jo-Anne McArthur] / We Animals Media

  1. Lebenshöfe garantieren Hühnern ein Leben ohne Ausbeutung. Hier stehen die Individuen mit ihren Bedürfnissen im Vordergrund. Nur ein Ort, der dies bietet, stellt einen sicheren Lebensraum für Hühner dar. Hier können sie ihr Leben genießen.

Quellen

1 CIRCABC (2021). Laying hens by way of keeping.2011-2021
2 Landschaftleben (o.D.). Haltungsformen in Österreich und weltweit. Käfighaltung.
3 Statistisches Bundesamt (2022). Jede Legehenne in Deutschland legte im Jahr 2021 im Schnitt 302 Eier. Pressemitteilung Nr. 15 vom 12.04.2022
4 Richter, T. (2006). Krankheitsursache Haltung: Beurteilung von Nutztierställen – Ein tierärztlicher Leitfaden. Georg Thieme Verlag. S. 153.
5 Hörning, B. (2009). Beurteilung der Tiergerechtheit der ‚Kleingruppenhaltung’ von Legehennen unter Berücksichtigung rechtlicher und ökonomischer Aspekte.
6 Rodenburg, T. B., Tuyttens, F. A., Sonck, B., De Reu, K., Herman, L., & Zoons, J. (2005). Welfare, health, and hygiene of laying hens housed in furnished cages and in alternative housing systemsJournal of Applied Animal Welfare Science8(3), 211-226.
7 Statistisches Bundesamt (2022). Jede Legehenne in Deutschland legte im Jahr 2021 im Schnitt 302 Eier. Pressemitteilung Nr. 15 vom 12.04.2022
8 Statistisches Bundesamt (2022). Eierproduktion 2021: Jedes achte Ei au Öko-Haltung. Pressemitteilung
9 Verordnung (EG) Nr. 589/2008 der Kommission vom 23. Juni 2008 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1234/2007 des Rates hinsichtlich der Vermarktungsnormen für Eier.
10 Verbraucherzentrale (2022) Eier aus Käfighaltung- versteckt in Lebensmitteln
11 Verbraucherzentrale (2022). Eier: Kennzeichnung, Herkunft, Färbung
12 BMEL (2019). Klöckner: Auch bei verarbeitetem Ei Informationen zur Haltung geben. Pressemitteilung Nr. 108/2019
13 Europäische Kommission (2019). Antwort auf eine parlamentarische Anfrage. Bezugsdokument: E-002939/2019
14 Vits, A. (2005). Evaluierung von Kleingruppenhaltung und ausgestalteten Käfigen für Legehennen hinsichtlich wirtschaftlicher und gesundheitlicher Parameter mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Legeleistung, Eiqualität und Knochenfestigkeit. Doktorarbeit. Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
15 Allen, T., et al. (2019). Inquiry into the Use of Battery Cages for Hens in the Egg Production Industry. The Law Society of New South Wales Young Lawyers. Sydney
16 Staack, M. & Knierim, U. (2003). Tiergerechtheit von Haltungssystemen für Legehennen. Studie im Auftrag des BUND, Berlin
17 Allen, T., et al. (2019). Inquiry into the Use of Battery Cages for Hens in the Egg Production Industry. The Law Society of New South Wales Young Lawyers. Sydney
18 Hartcher, K. M., & Jones, B. (2017). The welfare of layer hens in cage and cage-free housing systemsWorld’s Poultry Science Journal73(4), 767-782
19 Allen, T., et al. (2019). Inquiry into the Use of Battery Cages for Hens in the Egg Production Industry. The Law Society of New South Wales Young Lawyers. Sydney
20-21-22 Sojka (2001) Batteriekäfighaltung von Legehennen- Dauererfolg einer Lobby?
23 Bundesgesetzblatt (1987). Verordnung zum Schutz von Legehennen bei Käfighaltung (Hennenhaltungsverordnung).
24 Telle, M. (2011). Verhaltensbeobachtung bei der Kleingruppenhaltung von Legehennen. Doktorarbeit. Tierärztliche Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
25 Rat der Europäischen Union (1999). Richtlinie 1999/74/EG des Rates vom 19. Juli 1999 zur Festlegung von Mindestanforderungen zum Schutz von Legehennen
26 Mayr S. (2015). Optimierung der Kleingruppenhaltung von Legehennen: Tiergesundheit und Leistung von Lohmann Selected Leghorn (LSL) und Lohmann Brown Classic (LB) Legehennen. Doktorarbeit
27 Telle, M. (2011). Verhaltensbeobachtung bei der Kleingruppenhaltung von Legehennen. Doktorarbeit. Tierärztliche Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
28 Rat der Europäischen Union (1999). Richtlinie 1999/74/EG des Rates vom 19. Juli 1999 zur Festlegung von Mindestanforderungen zum Schutz von Legehennen
29 Brügesch, F. (2015). Untersuchungen zum Verhalten von Legehennen in der Kleingruppenhaltung: Empfehlungen für die ZukunftDoktorarbeit. Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. Halle (Saale)
30 Stütz, A. (2022). Legehennenhaltung- ein landwirtschaftlicher Betrieb erfindet sich neu. Statistisches Monatsheft Baden-Württemberg 4/2022
31 BMEL (2015). Mehr Tierschutz in der Legehennenhaltung. Artikel
32 Telle, M. (2011). Verhaltensbeobachtung bei der Kleingruppenhaltung von Legehennen. Doktorarbeit. Tierärztliche Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
33-34 Academic (o.D.). Kleingruppenhaltung.
35 Telle, M. (2011). Verhaltensbeobachtung bei der Kleingruppenhaltung von Legehennen. Doktorarbeit. Tierärztliche Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
36-37 Staack, M. & Knierim, U. (2003). Tiergerechtheit von Haltungssystemen für Legehennen. Studie im Auftrag des BUND, Berlin
38 Hörning, B. & Fölsch, D.W. (1999). Bewertung „ausgestalteter“ Käfige für die Legehennenhaltung bezüglich Tiergerechtheit. Gutachten im Auftrag der Hessischen Landestierschutzbeauftragten, Wiesbaden.
39 Telle, M. (2011). Verhaltensbeobachtung bei der Kleingruppenhaltung von Legehennen. Doktorarbeit. Tierärztliche Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
40 Olsson, I. A. S., & Keeling, L. J. (2005). Why in earth? Dustbathing behaviour in jungle and domestic fowl reviewed from a Tinbergian and animal welfare perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 93(3-4), 259-282
41 Staack, M. & Knierim, U. (2003). Tiergerechtheit von Haltungssystemen für Legehennen. Studie im Auftrag des BUND, Berlin
42 Telle, M. (2011). Verhaltensbeobachtung bei der Kleingruppenhaltung von Legehennen. Doktorarbeit. Tierärztliche Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
43-44-45 Staack, M. & Knierim, U. (2003). Tiergerechtheit von Haltungssystemen für Legehennen. Studie im Auftrag des BUND, Berlin
46 Telle, M. (2011). Verhaltensbeobachtung bei der Kleingruppenhaltung von Legehennen. Doktorarbeit. Tierärztliche Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
47 Tahamtani, F. M. et al.(2016). Effects of litter provision during early rearing and environmental enrichment during the production phase on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens. Poultry Science95(12), 2747-2756.
48Telle, M. (2011). Verhaltensbeobachtung bei der Kleingruppenhaltung von Legehennen. Doktorarbeit. Tierärztliche Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
49Staack, M. & Knierim, U. (2003). Tiergerechtheit von Haltungssystemen für Legehennen. Studie im Auftrag des BUND, Berlin
50Staack, M. & Knierim, U. (2003). Tiergerechtheit von Haltungssystemen für Legehennen. Studie im Auftrag des BUND, Berlin
51Rodenburg, T. B., Tuyttens, F. A., Sonck, B., De Reu, K., Herman, L., & Zoons, J. (2005). Welfare, health, and hygiene of laying hens housed in furnished cages and in alternative housing systemsJournal of Applied Animal Welfare Science8(3), 211-226.
52 Rodenburg, T. B., Tuyttens, F. A., Sonck, B., De Reu, K., Herman, L., & Zoons, J. (2005). Welfare, health, and hygiene of laying hens housed in furnished cages and in alternative housing systemsJournal of Applied Animal Welfare Science8(3), 211-226.
53 Bilčı́k, B., & Keeling, L. J. (2000). Relationship between feather pecking and ground pecking in laying hens and the effect of group size. Applied Animal Behaviour Science68(1), 55-66.
54 EFSA (2005). The welfare aspect of various systems of keeping laying hensThe EFSA Journal, 197, 1-23
55 Rodenburg, T. B., Tuyttens, F. A., Sonck, B., De Reu, K., Herman, L., & Zoons, J. (2005). Welfare, health, and hygiene of laying hens housed in furnished cages and in alternative housing systemsJournal of Applied Animal Welfare Science8(3), 211-226.
56-57 EFSA (2005). The welfare aspect of various systems of keeping laying hensThe EFSA Journal, 197, 1-23
58 Bazer, D. (2005). Einfluss einer Auslaufstrukturierung auf das Verhalten, den Gesundheitszustand und die Leistung von Legehennen in Freilandhaltung (Doctoral dissertation, lmu).
59 EFSA (2005). The welfare aspect of various systems of keeping laying hensThe EFSA Journal, 197, 1-23
60 Rahmann, G. & Oppermann, R. (2005). Ökologische Geflügelhaltung- wohin soll es gehen? 9. Internationale Geflügeltagung des Biolandverbandes
61 Thünen (o. D.). Hintergrund. Konventionelle Legehennenhaltung. Zuletzt abgerufen am 15.06.2022.
62-63-64 Mögliche Ausnahmen nach § 13 TierSchNutzV:
– Ställe, die vor dem 13. März 2002 in Benutzung genommen wurden
– Ställe bei denen Tageslichteinfall durch fehlende technische oder sonstige Möglichkeiten nicht oder nur mit unverhältnismäßig hohem Aufwand erreicht werden kann und eine dem natürlichen Licht so weit wie möglich entsprechende künstliche Beleuchtung sichergestellt ist.
65 agrarheute (2012). Käfighaltung: EU Kommission eröffnet Vertragsverletzungsverfahren
66 CIRCABC (2021). Laying hens by way of keeping.2011-2021
67 Vier Pfoten (2019). Die Schande der EU: Mehr als die Hälfte der Legehennen leben elend in Käfigen. Pressemitteilung
68 Europäische Kommission (2021). Fragen und Antworten: Kommission reagiert auf die Europäische Bürgerinitiative “End the Cage Age”.
69 Landschaftleben (o.D.). Haltungsformen in Österreich und weltweit. Käfighaltung.
70 Garnham, L., & Løvlie, H. (2018). Sophisticated fowl: the complex behaviour and cognitive skills of chickens and red junglefowl. Behavioral Sciences8(1), 13.
71 Dawkins, M. S. (1989). Time budgets in red junglefowl as a baseline for the assessment of welfare in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science24(1), 77-80.
72 Ekesbo, I. (2011). Farm animal behaviour: characteristics for assessment of health and welfare. CABI. S. 112