Factory Farming: Animal Suffering in Germany and Beyond
‘Factory farming’ has become a term that directly reminds people of the horrific conditions and confinement that animals are subjected to on a daily basis in industrial agriculture.
Animal suffering and exploitation are rightly associated with it. Huge sheds and barns without windows, overcrowded with animals on slatted floors or in cages that will never see daylight, fresh air and green grass.
The animals themselves suffer immensely from the profit-oriented exploitation of mega-farms. But this form of husbandry also poses a great threat to humans and, moreover, constitutes a serious problem for the environment, wildlife and the climate.
What is Factory Farming?
There is no uniform definition of factory farming. However, it could be described as ‘a system of farming in which a large number of animals are kept in a small closed area, in order to produce a higher yield of meat, eggs, or milk as cheaply as possible’1.
In addition to factory farming, this may also be known as intensive animal husbandry or industrial animal farming.
The term can be seen critically, as it makes animal individuals disappear into a voiceless, unidentifiable mass. This encourages the public to forget that each of the individual animals in this industry has its own interests, social ties and needs.
Even though there are no clear legally defined characteristics for factory farming practices, certain criteria can be delineated. Some of them, but not all, must apply at the same time:2
- High livestock numbers
- Specialisation in one type of animal (e.g. pig fattening, chicken fattening)
- Feed and young animals are purchased and not grown or bred in-house
- Feeding exclusively with concentrated feed for rapid weight gain
- Use of imported feed (corn and soybean meal)
- Delivery of the slurry to other farms
- Many animals per worker
- Extensive automation of work processes
- Inappropriate husbandry (no access to the outdoors, lack of bedding, high stocking densities)
- The use of “high performance” animals
The overall goal of these facilities is mass production of animal products. Mass production means that processes are rationalised, resulting in low unit costs to produce a high number of the same goods at low prices for the mass market3.
For the animals, this means that they have to live in huge groups in as little space as possible, and that everything that can be automated is automated.
In factory farms, animals are also required to produce the highest possible ‘output’ and are selectively bred to achieve this goal. This means that in meat production, they should reach their maximum size and weight in as short a time as possible. In dairy and egg production, they should produce as much milk and eggs as possible. However, as soon as this performance decreases and they are no longer considered profitable, they are killed and replaced with the next generation.
Factory Farming: Facts and Figures
In Germany alone, around 750 million animals live and die in factory farming every year 4. This number does not include fish who are becoming increasing farmed in such facilities.
98% of meat in Germany comes from factory farming 5.
Poultry stocks in Germany have almost tripled since 1900, and pig stocks have increased by about 1.6 times, although they have been declining again in recent years 6.
At the same time, it can be observed that there are fewer and fewer farms despite the increasing number of animals. Three quarters of chicken fattening farms have given up operations in the last 20 years 7. Therefore, more and more animals are concentrated on fewer and fewer farms.
| Animal species | 1900 | 1950 | 2000 | 2016 | 2020 |
| Poultry | 64.1 Million | 74.1 Million | 122.1 Million | 173.6 Million | 173.1 Million |
| Pigs | 16.8 Million | 17.6 Million | 25.6 Million | 28 Million | 26.3 Million |
| Cattle | 18.9 Million | 14.8 Million | 14.5 Million | 12.4 Million | 11.3 Million |
| Sheep | 9.7 Million | 2.7 Million | 2.7 Million | 1.8 Million | 1.8 Million |
| Goats | 3.3 Million | 1.4 Million | 0.1 Million | 0.1 Million | 0.2 Million |
| Total | 112.8 Million | 110.6 Million | 155 Million | 215.9 Million | 212.7 Million |
Tab. 1: Development of ‘livestock’ in Germany since 1900.8
There is no official number of animals that distinguishes a factory farm from a regular farm.
However, based on threshold values from the building laws10 , it could be suggested that a farm becomes an industrial facility when it has the capacity to raise the following numbers of animals:
- 600 cattle
- 560 sows
- 1,500 fattening pigs
- 15,0000 laying hens or turkeys for fattening
- 30,000 chickens for fattening
Most people, however, already assume mass livestock farming at lower numbers. 90% of consumers already see facilities with 500 cattle, 1000 pigs and 5000 chickens as mass livestock farms11.
The largest factory farm in Germany is in Brandenburg, with 1.6 million laying hens12. One of Europe’s largest pig fattening facilities in Alt-Tellin gained sad notoriety in 2021 when almost all of the more than 60,000 animals kept there burned to death in a major fire13.
The largest pig farm in the world is in China, where 84,000 animals are kept in one facility. Every year, 2.1 million animals pass through these facilities alone, where they live in multi-story high-rise buildings14,15.
Emergence of Factory Farming in Germany
The emergence of factory farming is closely intertwined with industrialisation. The industrial revolution was accompanied by the industrialisation of agriculture.
Through mechanisation, yields could be increased. Through rail networks, imports and exports could be realised and production steps could be outsourced16.
As a result, more and more specialisation took place. Instead of a classic farm with many different animals and its own fodder cultivation, farms emerged that specialised in one particular sub-sector and were dependent on buying or selling for the other sub-sectors17,18.
Feed is no longer grown on the farm but is instead mostly imported. Young animals are also bought in from other facilities. In the past, animals were slaughtered on the farm, but are now sold to meat processing companies and sent to slaughterhouses.
Just as industrialisation divided up steps in production down to the smallest detail in order to maximize output, these mechanisms were also applied to agriculture and animal husbandry.
Due to an ever-increasing demand for meat as a result of growing prosperity, the animals themselves were also industrialised through selective breeding19.
Wherever possible, processes were increasingly mechanised and automated in order to save manpower.
This development continues with a steady upward trend to this day. The economic miracle and government subsidies have fuelled the emergence of factory farms even more in recent decades.
In the Agricultural Investment Promotion Program (AFP), the German parties SPD and CDU promoted numerous large-scale barns from 2006 onward. Between 2007 and 2011, primarily conventional livestock buildings were directly subsidised with 98 million euros. In 2010 alone, 12.7 million euros was given to pig and poultry facilities20.
According to a recent study, 13.2 billion euros flow into the animal industry in Germany each year, either directly or indirectly21.
What Does Factory Farming Mean for Animal Welfare?
Factory farming prevents animals from living out their many needs. They are forced to live in a barren, stimulus-free environment.
In addition, they live in far large groups in very confined spaces, while in some forms of husbandry they may never see daylight throughout their lives.
When it comes to animals on factory farms, there can be no such thing as ‘good welfare’.
The effects of intensive husbandry and profit maximisation on the bodies of animals are evident in many ways. Only a few examples are listed here.
In the case of dairy cows, for example, the enormous, unnatural amounts of milk they are required to produce, housing that is not appropriate for the species, and frequent parturition lead to22:
- Mastitis, painful udder inflammation (an estimated 20 – 35 % of cows are affected)
- Lameness
- Reproductive organ disorders
- Circulatory and behavioural disorders
- Susceptibility to injuries of the skin and hooves
For pigs, due to the conditions under which they are kept, they commonly suffer from the following23:
- Bursitis, swellings at the leg joints that are caused by hard, slatted floors
- Calluses, also due to the concrete slatted floors without bedding
- Foot injuries
- Stomach ulcers
- Fertility disorders in sows
- Constipation
- Behavioural disorders such as tail and ear biting, navel sucking, ‘belly nosing’ of other piglets, urine drinking, mouthing behaviours, and ‘mourning behaviour’ (apathetic sitting position with head down and eyes closed)24
Natural behaviours and needs have no place in factory farming:
| Animal species | Natural behaviours | Industrial animal husbandry |
| Pigs25,26 | Construction of sleeping nests: small hollows for sleeping padded with natural materials
75% of the waking time is spent exploring, grazing and burrowing Faeces and urine are deposited far from the resting areas, which are kept very clean Establishing a nest for the piglets and strong care and defense27 |
Hard slatted floors partly concrete without bedding
An iron chain, an occupation machine or a ball on a string is available as enrichment for all animals in a group Sleeping places are in the same place as faeces and urine, which must be trodden by the animals through the slatted floors Mothers cannot even see their young properly as they are locked in crates where they cannot turn around. Mother and piglets lie on hard slatted floors |
| Cattle28 | Firm social structures with hierarchies and mutual care
Calves are suckled for half a year, there is a strong mother-child bond Discovery of the environment, curiosity Personal hygiene, search for dry places to sleep, to keep the coat clean |
Too large groups, the other animals are seen as strangers, which leads to aggression, stress and fear
Calves are separated from their mothers within 24 hours of birth Barren, monotonous environment where the urge to explore cannot be satisfied Lying on own excrements, if it has not fallen through the slatted floor |
| Chickens29 | Groups of 5 – 20 animals
Foraging for insects, worms, fruits and seeds, and exploring the environment Segregation from the group for nest building, egg laying and brooding |
Housed with tens of thousands of other chickens
No foraging or varied diet, feather pecking of conspecifics as a diverted need to peck and explore No distance from the others possible, no nest building, no breeding |
| Rabbits30 | Construction of branching burrows over generations with up to 150 tubes and 110 chambers
A very active life, with lots of movement and socialising |
Housed in stacked cages, painful footing on wire floor, no hiding places in mesh or barred cages
Almost no movement due to lack of space and cage floors |
Tab. 2: A comparison of natural behaviours and their limitations in factory farming according to animal species
The natural social structures of animals find no place in factory farming. In addition to the lack of opportunity to express natural behaviours, animals are a forced to live with thousands of others in a confined space. This prevents the formation of normal social grouping. As a result, the animals are distressed and are prone to behavioural disorders including aggression.
| Pigs | Cattle (specifications only for calves up to 6 months) |
Chickens | Rabbits | |
| Stocking density | N/A | N/A | Laying hens: on one level: 9 hens per m2; on several levels: 18 hens per m231 Chickens for fattening: max. 39 kg per m232 |
N/A |
| Minimum space | Fattening pigs: depending on weight: 0.5 – 1 m2 per pig33
Gilts: depending on group size: Sows: Piglets: depending on weight: 0.15 – 0.35 m2 per piglet36 Boar: from 24 months 6m2 per pig37 Box stands: Farrowing area at least. 6.5 m2, other requirements such as unhindered turning38 |
Group housing: depending on weight: 1.5 – 1.8m2 per calf39(‘Barns must be designed in such a way that the calves are free to lie down, stand up, adopt a natural posture, groom themselves and have access to feed and water’)40 Individual housing: |
Laying hens:42 at least 2.5m2, on which the hens can move according to their type and needs.Height at least 2 meters from the groundExceptions at the request of the keeper; for 9 laying hens at least a usable area of 1m2, with several levels 18 hens per m2 For fattening chickens, the information on stocking density (see above) applies |
Fattening rabbits per animal:43 1 – 4 animals: 1500cm2 5 – 10 animals: 1000cm2 11 – 24 animals: 850cm2 from 25 animals: 700cm2Breeding rabbits per animal: depending on weight: 6000 – 7400cm244further information regarding dimensions of cages and nest chambers for females45 |
Tab. 3: Simplified list of legal minimum space requirements according to the TierSchNutztV; n.a. = not applicable
In addition, injuries are regularly caused by the environment itself. Slipping on wet slatted floors, standing on cage grids in laying hen or rabbit cages, calluses from hard floors and chewing on constricting bars are just a few examples.
‘Older’ animals in the dairy and egg industries, are also killed long before their naturally attainable age, once they no longer provide the necessary profitable performance.
Overall, factory farming contradicts the interests and needs of animals in all respects. They are deprived of their freedom, their family and friendships, their physical and mental health and even daylight and fresh air.
Dangers of Industrial Animal Agriculture for Human Health
As well as serious animal suffering, factory farming also creates direct hazards for humans. Not only does this industry have negative effects on the climate and the environment, which also affect humans indirectly, it can also create specific health hazards.
Pandemics and Contaminations
Industrial animal husbandry is a breeding ground for pandemics. 75% of all pandemics are zoonotic46. These types of diseases can be transmitted from animals to humans or vice versa. They can be transmitted, for example, directly from wild animals to humans (through consumption of meat from wild animals or contact) or from wild animals to farmed animals47.
With the ever-increasing presence of humans and the reduction of pristine wildlife habitats, humans and human-owned animals are coming into contact with novel wildlife viruses more frequently.
On the other hand, the huge sheds and barns themselves make perfect breeding grounds for viruses and other pathogens. Highly lethal viruses, which do not spread so quickly in wild animals because they kill individual animals quickly, spread rapidly in factory farming sheds because the distances from one host to another could hardly be shorter.
Due to the fact that the animals here are so genetically similar, new viruses can spread unchecked in industrial animal farming systems49.
Apart from the danger to humans, full populations of farmed animal stocks, which can be in the thousands, are also repeatedly culled (emergency slaughtered) due to epidemics and pandemics. Some well known examples include avian influenza and swine flu50.
‘Food scandals’ caused by contaminated meat, eggs or milk also occur repeatedly, such as the occurrence of BSE (Bovine spongiforme Enzephalopathie or mad cow disease)51, caused by feeding animal protein to cattle, or the Dixion scandal with eggs in 201152.
Antibiotic Resistance
Antibiotic resistance is also a major threat. According to the WHO, this is one of the greatest threats to global health and food safety53.
This is understood as the ability of microorganisms to resist antimicrobial treatment. In short, antibiotics no longer work because a bacterium has become multiresistant, i.e. has adapted54.
Antibiotic resistance is attributed to overuse or misuse of antibiotics.
In factory farming, antibiotics are administered to promote growth (banned in the EU since 2006, but not yet in other parts of the world) and to prevent disease55. It is estimated that 70-80% of the world’s antibiotics are used in animal agriculture56.
Mass use poses an immense threat. Multi-resistant germs can develop here and the effectiveness of antibiotics can be reduced.
If zoonotic, resistant bacteria are involved, there is a serious risk to humans, as treatment with antibiotics is ineffective from the outset.
In addition, it is also becoming increasingly difficult or impossible to treat numerous bacterially triggered diseases such as pneumonia, tuberculosis, sepsis, gonorrhea or salmonella infections57.
The bottom line is that common illnesses and minor injuries can once again have fatal outcomes, as they did in the days before the discovery of penicillin58.
Hormones
In the EU, although the administration of growth hormones to animals is prohibited, sex hormones are routinely administered.
In pig breeding, for example, the hormone PMSG is administered to sows. This is obtained on horse farms from the blood of pregnant mares, whose foals are aborted as soon as the hormone is no longer present in the blood59.
The sexual cycle of the pigs is synchronised for ‘improved’ fertility management and the sows give birth to unnaturally large numbers of piglets60.
Substances with hormonal effects, such as carcinogenic and mutagenic steroids, also end up on fields and in drinking water from the slurry produced by intensive farming61.
Since the hormones are present in the meat and milk of animals, they are absorbed by humans who consume them. According to studies, there is a connection with breast and prostate cancer in humans62.
Intensive livestock farming is anything but sustainable and is responsible for devastating environmental pollution and climate damage. Th following examples are often connected with industrial animal farming:
- Rainforest clearing
- Species extinction
- Displacement of indigenous peoples
- Biodiversity loss
- Greenhouse gas emissions
- High water consumption
- Soil pollution
- Groundwater contamination
Rainforest Deforestation
90% of the world’s crop yields are fed to animals. Soy accounts for a large proportion of this. It is used as a cheap source of protein in animal fattening as concentrated feed. 80% of the soy grown is processed into food for animals63.
For the ever-increasing demand of the global market for animal products, huge areas of rainforest are being cleared for soy plantations and other pastures, especially in Brazil 64.
The importance of rainforests for the world’s climate is enormous. They are often called ‘the green lungs of the world’ and store huge amounts of CO2 in their plants and soils65.
They are also home to 90% of all primates, 80% of all insects, 40% of all birds and 60% of all plants on earth 66. Furthermore, in the course of deforestation, indigenous peoples are being driven from their homes67.
Environmental pollution is also manifested by significant emissions of, for example, harmful ammonia, gases that affect the climate, odors, dust, bioaerosols, fungi and bacteria68.
Cows emit large amounts of the greenhouse gas methane. Methane is considered ten to twenty times more harmful to the climate than CO2. In fact, almost 40% of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions could be attributed to animal digestion alone69.
Emissions, Soil Contamination and Water Consumption
According to a study by the independent Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP), the five largest meat and dairy companies are responsible for more greenhouse gas emissions annually than any of the oil companies Exxon-Mobil, Shell or BP70.
In addition, immense amounts of water are used for the production of animal products. 92% of the global water footprint is attributable to agriculture. The animal industry accounts for 29% of this71.
The production of one kilogram of beef consumes an average of 15,415 litres of water. A kilogram of sheep or goat meat requires an average of 9,000 litres.
The severe over fertilisation of the soil is also a major problem. The intensification of livestock farming produces enormous quantities of liquid manure. This is spread on fields as fertiliser.
This nitrogen-rich fertilizer leaches out the soil. In addition, nitrate, which is harmful to health, gets into the plants and groundwater72. In many areas of Germany, nitrate contamination of the groundwater exceeds the specified limits.
The value in groundwater is exceeded at 17% of the monitoring sites in relation to the whole of Germany, and at 28% of the monitoring sites in areas with a high density of livestock73.
In addition, high nitrogen levels lead to a nutrient depletion of the soils, which in turn results in higher fertilizer requirements with regard to the cultivation of plants74. This also affects soil biodiversity, especially the important microorganisms living in it.
Monocultures, Pesticides and Biodiversity
Soy, corn and cereals for animals are mainly grown in huge monocultures. Outside the EU, the varieties are mostly genetically modified for higher yields75. Since they are used for food for animals in the agriculture industry, the EU ban on genetic engineering for food does not apply.
Cultivation in monoculture strongly affects the soil, as nutrients are removed very unilaterally, and is a major factor in the destruction of ecosystems and biodiversity76. Especially since high amounts of pesticides are used in this area, which are harmful to humans, animals and the environment77.
Which Animals are Kept on Factory Farms?
In Germany, the following animals are the most commonly found in factory farming systems:
- Chickens
- Turkeys
- Pigs
- Cattle
However, rabbits, goats and sheep are also kept in factory farms. For the latter, there are no specific legal requirements on how they are to be kept.
There are also factory farmed fish and other marine animals that are kept in aquacultures, which causes many separate problems for oceans, wild animals and entire ecosystems. Even for octopi, which are actually solitary, the world’s first industrial factory farm was built in Spain78.
Furthermore, intensive animal farms exist not only for the production of animal-based foods, but also for wool, fur, pearls and silk.
For example, huge farms of merino sheep in Australia, fur farms with mink, arctic foxes or dogs, breeding farms of oysters and factory farming of silkworms.
Alternatives to Factory Farming
Intensive animal husbandry creates suffering, environmental damage, and health hazards.
But in smaller farms, the animals are also subject to exploitation.
Only a form of husbandry in which the bodies of animals are not subjected to the profit interests of humans can offer animals a fulfilling life according to their own interests.
In the transformation phase until the end of factory farming, animals rescued from industrial production can live a peaceful and species-appropriate life at animal sanctuaries.
In addition, repurposing existing agricultural land for plant-based human food could save resources, feed more people, and reduce climate and environmental damage.
In order to avert the effects and dangers in all areas, the following is therefore necessary until factory farming is a thing of the past:
- A gradual reduction in the number of animals (Link zu englischen Artikel einfügen)
- Promoting the cultivation of plant proteins for human nutrition
- Conversion of agricultural land currently used for animal feed production
- The prohibition of prophylactic antibiotic use and hormone administration
- Higher animal welfare standards that make life in the animal industry more bearable
- Stronger controls and higher penalties for violations
Turning away from factory farming is in the interest of all living beings on this planet, but first and foremost of the animals living there, who are subjected to unspeakable suffering, pain and death.
FAQs
What is the Argument Against Factory Farming?
The main argument against industrial livestock farming is that the animals suffer greatly and are exploited. Factory farming also poses great risks to humans due to pandemics, antibiotic resistance and hormones. This industry also damages the environment and climate due to over fertilisation, rainforest clearing and high water consumption.
How do Animals Feel in Factory Farming?
Animals suffer in intensive livestock farming. They have hardly any space, no access to fresh air and daylight. They cannot have family relationships and friendships, they often suffer from behavioural disorders, stress and injuries. The barn facilities are barren, uncomfortable and the animals do not have their needs met.
Where is Factory Farming Most Prominent?
The most factory farming in Germany is in Lower Saxony, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and North Rhine-Westphalia. Worldwide, China is the country with the most pig farming (more than half of all pigs are kept there), the most beef is produced in the USA, Brazil and China, and most broiler chickens also live in the USA.
Can Factory Farming be Abolished?
Almost 70% of Germans want a ban on factory farming. An abolition of factory farming is also necessary and possible: with a gradual reduction of animal stocks and a restructuring of agriculture by promoting the cultivation of plant proteins for human nutrition.
Sources
1 Duden, Defintion Massentierhaltung (zuletzt aufgerufen am 14.07.2022)
2 Hörning, B. (2019). “Massentierhaltung” in Deutschland? Eine Annäherung, in: Rückert-John, J., Kröger, M. (Hrsg.), Fleisch. Vom Wohlstandssymbol zur Gefahr für die Zukunft (2019)
3 Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, https://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/definition/massenproduktion-39175 (zuletzt aufgerufen am 05.08.2022)
4 Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations (FAO), in Deutschland geschlachtete Tiere im Jahr 2020 (ohne Fische und Meerestiere, Kaninchen sind nicht erfasst)
5 Engeln, H, Hauschild J., Harf, R., Herzinfarkt auf dem Bauernhof, GEOkompakt “Gesunde Ernährung”
6 Statistisches Bundesamt. Niedrigster Schweinebestand in Deutschland seit 25 Jahren. Pressemitteilung Nr. 596 vom 22.12.2021.
7 Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung (2021). Produktion in Deutschland. Rabiater Strukturwandel. Fleischatlas 2021, S. 36
8 Statistisches Bundesamt, Bestandsentwicklung an Nutztieren in Deutschland im Verlauf der Jahre 1900 bis 2020, destatis.de
9 Statistisches Bundesamt, Bestandsentwicklung an Nutztieren in Deutschland im Verlauf der Jahre 1900 bis 2020, destatis.de
10 § 35 BauGB i.V.m. § 4 BImSchG i.V.m. Vierte Verordnung zur Durchführung des Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetzes (Verordnung über genehmigungsbedürftige Anlagen – 4. BImSchV), Anhang 1
11 Kayser, M., Schlieker, K., Spiller, A. (2012), Die Wahrnehmung des Begriffs “Massentierhaltung” aus Sicht der Gesellschaft, in: Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (Hrsg.), Berichte über Landwirtschaft 90 (3) Dezember 2012, S. 417, 421
12 Landtag Brandenburg, Drs. 05/8229 (25.11.2013), Anlage 1 zu Frage 1 Kleine Anfrage 3207, Landkreis Spree-Neiße – EHLEGO Landhof GmbH
13 Dietzke, A. (2022, 25.06.), Ermittlungen zu Brand in Schweinezuchtanlage in Alt-Tellin eingestellt. 60.000 Tiere starben qualvoll, Der Tagesspiegel
14 Kramper, G. (2021, 01.01.), Die größte Schweinefarm der Welt wird zwei Millionen Tiere pro Jahr aufziehen, Stern.de
15 Dietzke, A. (2021, 12.09.), Das Schweinehochhaus – null Tierwohl, dafür maximaler Profit, Der Tagesspiegel
16 Kassung, C. (2021), Fleisch. Die Geschichte einer Industrialisierung, S. 18
17 Mahlerwein, C (2020, 24.09.), Strukturwandel und Agrarentwicklung seit 1880, bpb
18 Tamásy, C. (2014, 09.11.), Intensivierung der Landwirtschaft im Oldenburger Münsterland. Nutztierhaltung im Fokus der Nachhaltigkeit, Standort 38 (2014)
19 Kassung, C. (2021), Fleisch. Die Geschichte einer Industrialisierung, S. 16
20 Müller, A. (2016, 13.01.), Mecklenburg-Vorpommern: Wo die Megaställe stehen, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, Fleischatlas regional
21 Studie (2021), Milliarden für die Tierindustrie. Wie der Staat öffentliche Gelder in eine zerstörerische Branche leitet, Bündnis Gemeinsam gegen die Tierindustrie (Hrsg.)
22 EFSA (2009, 09.07.), Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease, Annex to EFSA Journal (2009) 1143
23 Brade, W., Flachowsky, G. (2006). Schweinezucht und Schweinefleischerzeugung. Empfehlungen für die Praxis
24 Meyer, C., Hillmann, E., Schrader, L., Verhalten, Haltung, Bewertung von Haltungssystemen, in: Brade, W., Flachowsky, G. (2006). Schweinezucht und Schweinefleischerzeugung. Empfehlungen für die Praxis, S. 111
25 Marchant-Forde, J.M. (2009). The Welfare Of Pigs
26 Meyer, C., Hillmann, E., Schrader, L., Verhalten, Haltung, Bewertung von Haltungssystemen, in: Brade, W., Flachowsky, G. (2006). Schweinezucht und Schweinefleischerzeugung. Empfehlungen für die Praxis, S. 91 ff.
27 Grauvogl, A. (1958). Über das Verhalten des Hausschweines unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Fortpflanzungsverhaltens. Freie Universität Berlin Veterinärmedizin
28 EFSA (2009, 09.07.), Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease, Annex to EFSA Journal (2009) 1143, S. 18 ff.
29 Albert-Schweitzer-Stiftung, Legehennen, https://albert-schweitzer-stiftung.de/massentierhaltung/legehennen (zuletzt aufgerufen am 29.07.2022)
30 Albert-Schweitzer-Stiftung, Kaninchen, https://albert-schweitzer-stiftung.de/massentierhaltung/kaninchen (zuletzt aufgerufen am 27.07.2022)
31 § 13a Abs. 2 TierSchNutztV
32 § 19 Abs. 3 TierSchNutztV mit Abweichungen in Abs. 4 TierSchutztNutztV
33 § 29 TierSchNutztV
34 § 30 TierSchNutztV
35 § 30 TierSchNutztV
36 § 28 Abs. 2 S. 2 TierSchNutztV
37 § 25 TierSchNutztV
38 § 24 TierSchNutztV
39 § 10 Abs. 1 TierSchNutztV
40 § 6 TierSchNutztV
41 § 8 TierSchNutztV
42 § 13a TierSchNutztV
43 § 32 Abs. 3 S. 1 TierSchNutztV
44 § 34 Abs. 2 S. 1 TierSchNutztV
45 § 34 Abs. 3 und 4 TierSchNutztV
46 FAO (2009), The State of Food and Agriculture, S. 84
47 Schmidinger, K. (2020, 09.11.) Wie Tierkonsum zur nächsten Pandemie führt. Albert-Schweitzer-Stiftung (zuletzt aufgerufen am 27.07.2022)
48 Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung (2021). Produktion in Deutschland. Rabiater Strukturwandel. Fleischatlas 2021, S. 32 ff.
49 Schmidinger, K. (2020, 09.11.) Wie Tierkonsum zur nächsten Pandemie führt. Albert-Schweitzer-Stiftung (zuletzt aufgerufen am 27.07.2022)
50 Nach ASP-Ausbruch: Erste Schweine werden geschlachtet. NDR vom 29.07.2022 (zuletzt aufgerufen am 05.08.2022);
Vogelgrippe: 42.000 Hühner werden in Japan notgeschlachtet. Augsburger Allgemeine vom 29.12.2014 (zuletzt aufgerufen am 05.08.2022)
51 Bundesministerium für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung, BSE – Bovine Spongiforme Enzephalopathie (zuletzt aufgerufen am 27.07.2022)
52 Grossmann, S. (2021, 03.01.) Dioxin-Skandal erschüttert vor zehn Jahren Deutschland. NDR (zuletzt aufgerufen am 27.07.2022)
53 WHO (2020, 31.07.). Antibiotic resistance. Fact sheet.
54 EFSA, Antibiotikaresistenz (zuletzt aufgerufen am 27.07.2022)
55 Stellungnahme Akademie der Wissenschaften in Hamburg, Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (2013), Antibiotika-Forschung: Probleme und Perspektiven, in: Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Hamburg, Band 2, S. 31
56 Ritchie, H. (2017, 16.11.). How do we reduce antibiotic resistance from livestock?. ourwolrdindata.org (zuletzt aufgerufen am 27.07.2022)
57 WHO (2020, 31.07.). Antibiotic resistance. Fact sheet.
58 WHO (2020, 31.07.). Antibiotic resistance. Fact sheet.
59 Castronovo, A., Eder, J. (2017, 07.04.) Pferdeblut für die Schweinezucht: 5 Fakten zu Blutfarmen, agrarheute (zuletzt aufgerufen am 27.07.2022)
60 Deutsche Juristische Gesellschaft für Tierschutz (DJGT) (2021, 13.08.), Forderung der DJGT: Verbot der Gewinnung von Stutenblut (zuletzt aufgerufen am 27.07.2022)
61 Endres, A. (2014, 09.01.) Unser täglich Hormonfleisch, Die Zeit
62 Nürnberger, D. (2014, 07.01.), Risiken durch Hormone in Schweinefleisch, Deutschlandfunk (zuletzt aufgerufen am 05.08.2022)
63 Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung (2021). Ernten bis der Viehtrog voll ist. Fleischatlas 2021, S. 16
64 Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung (2021). Ernten bis der Viehtrog voll ist. Fleischatlas 2021, S. 16
65 Melzer, A. (2020, 10.11.) Der Amazonas Regenwald: Das grüne Herz der Erde, Greenpeace (zuletzt aufgerufen am 28.07.2022)
66 Kopp, I. (2021, 14.03.) Ökosystem Regenwald: Darum ist es so wichtig für uns. Utopia (zuletzt aufgerufen am 28.07.2022)
67 Fischermann, T. (2019, 20.05.), Regenwald vernichten, Indigene vertreiben. Zeit online (zuletzt aufgerufen am 27.07.2022)
68 Tamásy, C. (2014, 09.11.), Intensivierung der Landwirtschaft im Oldenburger Münsterland. Nutztierhaltung im Fokus der Nachhaltigkeit, Standort 38 (2014)
69 Umweltbundesamt (2022, 23.03.), Beitrag der Landwirtschaft zu den Treibhausgas-Emissionen (zuletzt aufgerufen am 28.07.2022)
70 Studie (2018), Emission impossible. Institue for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP) (Hrsg.)
71 Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung (2021). Der unsichtbare Durst der Tiere – und ihres Futters. Fleischatlas 2021, S. 26
72 Keller, A., Schulin, R. (2017), Stoffhaushalt von Landwirtschaftsböden, in: Krebs, R., Egli, M., Schulin, R., Tobias, S. (Hrsg.), Bodenschutz in der Praxis, S. 182, 183
73 Umweltbundesamt (2022, 23.03.) FAQs zu Nitrat im Grund- und Trinkwasser (zuletzt aufgerufen am 28.07.2022)
74 Hüttl, R., Meyer, S. (1999). Über Massentierhaltung und das Langzeitgedächtnis der Böden. Gegenworte, S. 30
75 Bundesinformationszentrum Landwirtschaft. Gentechnik in Futtermitteln (zuletzt aufgerufen am 27.07.2022)
76 Geyer, O. (2021, 25.03.) Viel zu wenig. Der Verlust der Biodiversität ist so weit vorangeschritten, dass es selbst für uns Menschen gefährlich werden könnte. Warum handeln wir nicht ?. Fluter (zuletzt aufgerufen am 27.07.2022)
77 Keller, A., Schulin, R. (2017), Stoffhaushalt von Landwirtschaftsböden, in: Krebs, R., Egli, M., Schulin, R., Tobias, S. (Hrsg.), Bodenschutz in der Praxis, S. 182, 187
78 Weishaupt, M. (2022, 12.07.), Weltweit erste Oktopus-Farm löst Tierschutz-Debatte aus. National Geographic (zuletzt aufgerufen am 05.08.2022)