The Hidden Cruelty of the Wool Industry

Many people consider wool to be a natural, sustainable and animal-friendly material. Images of sheep grazing peacefully continue to shape the public perception of the wool industry to this day. In reality, however, much of the wool traded worldwide is produced through industrial livestock farming, where economic interests take precedence over animal welfare. Breeding for ever-increasing wool yields, painful procedures, stressful transport and the slaughter of animals as soon as their productivity declines, is the reality in many production systems. Wool is not merely a by-product, but the result of an industry associated with considerable animal suffering.

 

What is Wool?

Wool is the umbrella term for animal hair that has been processed, dyed and/or spun in order to create textile products. Wool from sheep is the most well known internationally. However, the term wool not only refers to the hair of sheep, but also to alpacas, rabbits or even a blend of several species. Traditionally, wool is produced from the hair of the following animals:

  • Sheep
  • Alpacas
  • Llamas and vicuñas
  • Angora Rabbits
  • Goats (Cashmere and Angora)
  • Yaks
  • Camels1

These animals are often bred specifically for the production of wool . This means that they have been ‘optimised’ to produce particularly large quantities of hair or fleece over an extended period of time. This is particularly evident in the case of sheep. Originally, these animals were able to shed their fleece naturally to prevent them from overheating in the warmer months. However, modern sheep are the result of centuries of selective breeding and no longer have this capability, making them dependent on shearing. Other animals, including Angora rabbits, are also reliant on humans to remove their hair.2

Animal Society Logo

Who We Are – Animal Society is a non-profit organisation dedicated to advocating for the rights and interests of animals and encouraging society and politics to end animal suffering. Through our educational efforts and political campaigns, we create transparency to establish effective animal policy. More

The Wool Industry in Figures

Which Countries Produce the Most Wool?

In 2023, China topped the global wool production rankings with 367,000 tonnes, followed by Australia with 324,000 tonnes. New Zealand came third with 124,000 tonnes.

 

Dargestellt sind die sechs größten Wollproduzenten 2023. Die Grafik basiert auf Informationen von https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/wool-production-by-country

How Is Wool Produced?

Before it can be processed into woollen textiles, hair is cut from the animals, combed out or, in some countries, even plucked. Sheep are generally shorn once a year, usually in spring. The softest and ‘highest quality’ parts of the fleece are then used for wool. In the case of other animals, such as Angora rabbits and Angora goats, the hair is partly combed out or, in some cases, plucked out by hand.

In the past and in more traditional practices, sheep were shorn with scissors. However, removing the fleece with shearing scissors is not an efficient method for modern standards. In farming today, sheep are instead usually shorn on an industrial scale. To do this, the animals are taken to a shearing shed or pen and shorn with a hand-held machine.3 The animals are often injured in the process. The sharp blades can cut into or even slice away parts of the skin. The sheep are frightened during the shearing process and struggle, which increases the risk of injury. Furthermore, industrial shearing is designed for time efficiency, meaning each sheep must be processed quickly. There is no scope to cater for the animals’ individual needs or body types. When hair is removed from other species, there is also no time to comb out the hair during mass industrial processing. Consequently, the hair is often simply and rapidly plucked out. This practice of removing hair from animals is prohibited in Europe.

On this farm in Slovenia, the sheep are shorn twice a year.

The hair or fleece is then collected, sorted and washed. To obtain the right texture for use, it is brushed (‘carded’) and spun. It is then processed further as required, i.e. dyed and treated.

What Are the Different Types of Wool?

Sheep and Merino Wool

Sheep wool is probably the best-known and most widely used type in the Western world. Sheep can live for 10–12 years. The domestic sheep commonly found here are descended from the Armenian mouflon and are reared for their fleece, meat and milk.

Domestic sheep no longer shed their fleece naturally.

Today’s domestic sheep rely on humans for their survival. This is because they have been selectively bred to the extent that their fleece continues to grow even when the animal can no longer move. In very heavy rain, their fleece can even become so saturated that they lose their balance and fall. If you discover a sheep that is unable to stand, it is important to assist them and ensure that they are able to stand and walk unaided.4

Most of the sheep wool produced worldwide originates from China and Australia.5 The international market value stands at around 3 billion euros, with an annual production of almost 2 million tonnes of wool from 1.2 billion sheep.6

Australia, as one of the main suppliers of sheep fleece, is also the country where a procedure called ‘mulesing’ is a common practice. This practice is the mutilation of merino lambs, involving the surgical removal of the skin folds around the tail, without anaesthetic.

Alpaca Wool

Alpacas tend to get cold quickly after being shorn, particularly in higher altitudes.

Alpacas are even-toed ungulates and belong to the camel family. They are native to the highlands and mountains of South America. Their thick, warm coat means they are well adapted to cold temperatures. This remarkable adaptation of their coat is the reason why their wool is so sought after and why they are exploited for it today. In the wild, they can live for up to 25 years.

Alpaca wool is prized for its lightness and fineness. It is one of the most expensive types of wool. Similarly to sheep, farmed alpaca fleece grows continuously, leading them to also be dependent on humans for survival. These alpacas no longer undergo a natural moult, which is why they have to be shorn. Wild alpacas are able to shed their hair naturally. This process is stressful for the animals and causes them anxiety. Alpacas place great importance on their personal space. This is infringed upon by the restraint and rough handling used during the  shearing process. Furthermore, shearers are often paid by volume of animals, not by the hour. This leads to careless work and causes additional physical injury to the animals. The lack of protection provided by their fleece increases the likelihood of parasitic diseases and overheating, as the coat has thermoregulatory properties.7

The global market value of alpaca wool stood at 3.11 billion US dollars in 2023.8 80 per cent of this figure originates from South America, where 80,000 tonnes were produced annually in 2024 alone.9

Alpacas are native to the mountainous regions of South America. They are also bred there on a large scale.

Cashmere and Mohair

Cashmere comes from several different breeds of goat that are related to the domestic goat. They are native to the high mountains of Central Asia and are reared for their particularly fine undercoat. Cashmere is regarded as one of the finest fibres in the world. The animals are hardy and their coats are adapted to extreme weather conditions. In their countries of origin, the hair is combed out; in Western regions, the goats are shorn. A cashmere goat yields only 200g of undercoat per year.10 This makes the production of cashmere extremely expensive.

An Angora goat in North Wales.

Due to its fineness, cashmere is often used for luxury garments such as jumpers and coats. The cashmere market was valued at around 3.12 billion US dollars in 2025. The German market accounted for 21.9 per cent of total turnover.11 Around 20,000 tonnes of raw cashmere are produced annually. After processing, this yields 6,500 tonnes of pure cashmere 12 . If 200 g is obtained from each goat per year, 2 million animals are required. It takes four goats and one year to produce a single jumper.

Iran, Afghanistan, China and Mongolia are the largest producers of cashmere. Germany, China, Japan, the United Kingdom and Italy are the largest importers.13

The hair of the Angora goat is known as mohair and should not be confused with Angora wool, which comes from rabbits. Mohair is considered even more luxurious than cashmere, as it is finer and lighter. Angora goats have white, silky, curly coats, which make them highly sought-after by the textile and fashion industry. The majority of mohair fibre is produced in South Africa, the USA and Turkey.14

Angora goats produce between three and eight kilograms of wool each year. They are shorn twice a year. As with other animals, this procedure is extremely stressful. The animals are processed quickly and, in some cases, their skin is cut away. On some farms, they are brutally dragged across the floor and thrown about. Outside of the shearing process, they may also be subjected to painful mutilations. Goats are often castrated and slaughtered without anaesthesia or painkillers; sometimes their ears are cut off as well. Some of the goats are kept without access to daylight. 15 As Angora goats often live in mountainous regions, the goats are unable to keep warm after shearing and, depending on the weather conditions, may even die as a result.16

Angora goats at a Sunday market in China.

Angora

Angora wool is produced from the hair of Angora rabbits. Their fur is long and grows back continuously. These rabbits normally have a life expectancy of 5–8 years. On commercial rabbit farms, however, life expectancy is much shorter. As keeping Angora rabbits is only financially viable for three years, most are killed once they reach this age.17 This type of fibre originates from the province of Angora, near Ankara in Turkey. The wool is prized for its warming and supposedly anti-rheumatic properties.18

 

Angora rabbits that are raised on an industrial scale are normally albino, as this makes their wool easier to dye.

Every year, between 4,000 and 8,000 tonnes of Angora wool are produced worldwide, with prices ranging from 35 to 260 USD per kilogram. China is the largest producer of Angora wool, with a market share of 80–90%.19 Around 20 million rabbits are housed there in appalling conditions.20

China is the world’s largest producer of Angora wool.

Animal Welfare Issues in the Wool Industry

Production of Merino and Other Sheep Wool

Sheep are reared in various ways. Most sheep live outdoors all year round. However, there are also intensive farming systems in which the animals live exclusively in sheds. This type of farming causes a great deal of stress.

Sheep reared for wool are kept both indoors and outdoors.

As they age, the animals usefulness for the wool trade declines. When their fleeces are no longer productive enough for textiles manufacturing, the sheep are often transported to be slaughtered in other countries where animal welfare regulations are less stringent. To this end, they may travel for many days or weeks over long distances to be slaughtered, forced to endure extreme temperatures whilst crammed together in confined spaces. This causes prolonged suffering and distress for the sheep.21

Here, sheep were repeatedly loaded onto and unloaded from a lorry, and were herded and chased by sheepdogs. The animals were beaten and then transported to the abattoir or for resale.

Sheep that are also kept for milk production are separated from their lambs – much like cows. This causes considerable emotional stress for both. Sheep are highly social animals that live in close-knit groups. Separation from the mother causes severe stress and behavioural problems in the lamb. The mother also suffers from the separation and reacts with anxiety.22

The dairy industry separates lambs from their mothers at a very early age.

Mulesing is a practice that is carried out primarily, though not exclusively, on Merino sheep. As one of the world’s leading producers of sheep wool, Australia is also the country where this practice is most common. Due to selective breeding, Merino sheep have a particularly woolly and wrinkled anal region. Due to the excess fleece and skin, faeces and urine can build up in this area, which in turn attracts blowflies. The larva of Lucilia cuprina plays a central role in what is known as sheep myiasis (flystrike). It poses a significant economic problem for the wool industry. Infested sheep often initially show a reduced appetite. If left untreated, the larval infestation can progress rapidly and, as a result of the spreading inflammation, lead to the death of the affected animal.23

Herds of sheep are very large, with some farms having several thousand animals. In practice, it is therefore often virtually impossible to identify individual infected animals in time and treat them effectively.

In response to this risk, the practice of mulesing was introduced in 1931 by the Australian farmer John Mules. The procedure involves the surgical removal of the excess skin in the tail and rump region of lambs aged between approximately two and twelve weeks. Lambs are restrained on their backs while strips of skin are cut away from their backside. This is often carried out without adequate pain relief, or with none at all. The aim of this mutilating procedure is to create scarred, hairless patches of skin. These are less prone to moisture build-up and are therefore intended to prevent infestation by fly maggots. The procedure causes the animals enormous distress and inflicts excruciating pain. 70% of Merino lambs endure this procedure.24

Lambs after the mulesing procedure, as shown here in Argentina.

Production of Alpaca Wool

Alpacas are flight animals and are subjected to enormous stress during shearing. They scream and spit in an attempt to resist being restrained. The animals are treated roughly. On some farms, wounds sustained during shearing are stitched up with a needle and thread, without anaesthetic. To identify the animals, parts of their ears are also sometimes cut off without pain relief. Alpacas are extremely sensitive animals that react with particular distress to such treatment.

Alpacas are restrained on the ground for shearing. This is extremely frightening for these sensitive, flight-prone animals.

Alpacas are kept in mountainous terrain, but they are rarely provided with shelter to protect them from extreme weather conditions. Many young animals fall ill and die from this exposure as a result.25

Alpacas can die from hypothermia.

Production of Cashmere and Mohair

Goat herds are often very large. This leads to competition for food and shelter.

Goats reared for cashmere or mohair are mainly kept outdoors, although they may also be housed in sheds under extreme conditions. The animals are often kept in huge herds numbering thousands. In such circumstances, it is impossible to focus on the welfare or the veterinary care of individual animals. This leads to competition for feed and a lack of protection from the elements. Large herds therefore lead to increased stress amongst the animals and injuries resulting from fighting.26

Herd of sheep in Harshil Valley Uttarakhand.Goats and Sheep in North India

A large proportion of cashmere  is produced in China. Footage filmed covertly in factories in China and Mongolia shows that goats are severely mistreated during the hair removal process. The animals are either roughly plucked with metal combs or shorn. Some are forcibly restrained and pressed to the ground, with their legs overextended. The animals cry out in pain and distress.27

Injuries sustained during this process are not treated by a vet. This leads to infections, and some animals die as a result. Animals that no longer meet the sufficient ‘wool yield’ are then used for the meat industry and, in some cases, killed on the spot. On some farms, it is standard practice to stun the animals by striking them before their throats are slit.

There is no applicable animal welfare legislation in China, which makes this practice legal. Existing certification and labelling schemes are not sufficient to effectively improve animal welfare in the farms involved.28

Production of Angora Wool

As China produces the largest proportion of Angora wool worldwide, the living conditions for the vast majority of Angora rabbits are appalling. By international standards, animal welfare in China is inadequate. The farming system is geared towards maximum yield. The animals are kept in tiny metal cages without bedding or any other materials, forced to live in their own excrement. They remain confined in these cages throughout their short lives; some appear unable to move.29

An Angora rabbit in China

Male rabbits produce less fur than females and most are killed immediately after birth. After just 8 weeks, the female rabbits are either shorn for the first time or have their fur torn out (plucked) whilst fully conscious, for the first time. To do this, they are restrained by all four paws and stretched out. As rabbits are flight animals, they sometimes suffer heart attacks during this process. This procedure is repeated every few months. The few animals that survive are hung upside down after 3–5 years. Their throats are then slit so that they can be sold for meat.30

Environmental Damage Caused by Wool Production

It is not only the animals bred for wool that suffer as a result of production. Wool production also has a negative impact on the environment and, consequently, on wildlife. The process is very resource-intensive as animals must be bred, reared and kept in order to produce wool. The animals require food and water, medication and space. They produce waste such as faeces and urine, which causes damage when produced in such large quantities. But even after shearing, wool remains resource-intensive: it must be cleaned, a process that involves large quantities of water and chemicals. It is then processed further in factories that consume large amounts of energy. The dyeing process is also harmful to the environment. The following section examines the environmental impact of sheep wool, as this is the area for which the most extensive body of research is available.

Livestock farming produces large quantities of greenhouse gases. According to a 2013 study, the total emissions for one kilogram of raw wool averaged 24.9 kg of CO₂ equivalent. A large proportion of this is methane produced directly on the farm (86% of total emissions). This is followed by nitrous oxide (10% in total), which originates from manure. In addition, there are also emissions that are produced from fertilisers and feed production.31

There are, however, significant regional differences. In dry areas in particular, good grazing management is essential to prevent soil damage. In New Zealand, soil and water contamination from old sheep-bathing sites containing arsenic – which was used in sheep farming until 1950 – is well documented.32 British longitudinal studies show that grazing in moors and hilly landscapes has drastically reduced biodiversity.33 Generally speaking, any intensive grazing or use of land tends to have negative effects on an ecosystem.34

Large herds place an enormous strain on the environment.

The Cleaning and Processing of Wool

After the sheep have been shorn, the fleece must be cleaned. As the fibres are hydrophilic and can absorb almost a third of their weight in water, this process is very resource-intensive. Chemical additives such as phosphates, sulphates, alkalis, acids and heavy metals are used in the cleaning process. This contaminates the water used in the cleaning process and has serious consequences for the environment.35

The cleaning process consists of several steps. To remove plant residues, a process known as carbonisation is used. The fleece is soaked in a solution of sulphuric acid and water for 10–15 minutes. The cellulose is then dissolved, making it easier to remove. A heating process produces hydrochloric acid, which then breaks down the cells. There are also other methods that involve the use of heavy metals or gaseous acids.

Alkalis and other surfactants are used to remove fats from the raw wool. Most of the chemicals used in the cleaning of raw wool are extremely harmful to the environment. Throughout this process, specific temperatures must be maintained, which also requires a large amount of energy.

 

Once the wool has been cleaned and a specific pH level has been reached, it is ready for dyeing. The dyeing process also involves the use of a range of chemicals that are harmful to the environment. Dyeing the wool also uses the greatest amount of energy and water. The wool is washed several times during and after dyeing. Some of the dyes contain heavy metals such as nickel and chromium. These are carcinogenic.

After dyeing, the wool is treated once more to remove as many toxins as possible. This results in the water used becoming heavily polluted.36

Is There Such a Thing as Ethical Wool?

Alternatives to Wool

Fortunately, there are many soft and cosy alternatives to animal fibres. These are available both as yarn for handicrafts and as ready-made products:

  • Cotton (versatile and breathable)
  • Hemp (durable, good temperature regulation)
  • Bamboo (breathable and lightweight)
  • Nettle fibre (tend to be used as a blended yarn)
  • Soya fibre

Industrial fibres often come closest to the familiar comfort of animal wool. However, there are significant differences. Some industrial fibres are made from processed plant fibres, whilst others are made from synthetic materials. These are the most popular:

  • Tencel (made from wood fibre; very soft with good temperature and moisture regulation)
  • Viscose (soft and comfortable against the skin; industrially processed cellulose)
  • Modal (more durable and softer than viscose)
  • Acrylic (produced directly from crude oil; less sustainable)

 

Natural fibres offer a good alternative to animal wool.

What Can Consumers Do?

Reducing the suffering of animals exploited for wool is a matter of urgency. One way to do this is to minimise purchases of products containing fibres from animals or avoiding buying wool products altogether.

Fast-fashion brands in particular engage in so-called ‘greenwashing’ to portray their own products as particularly sustainable or animal-friendly. However, this is not the case. These companies can only offer their goods so cheaply because they rely on the exploitation of both animals and people.

It is also important not be misled by ‘higher-quality’ products or ‘luxury brands’ either. They too, often source their wool from exploitative farms. Whether the wool is affordable or luxurious, there is no guarantee as to where it is sourced from, or how the animals are treated. Even if it is not a mass-production operation, shearing and handling cause animals significant stress and injury.

Avoiding animal-based fibres is the only way to prevent animal exploitation in the textile industry. With a wide array of sustainable plant-based alternatives on offer, it is possible to enjoy the same cosy clothing and creative crafting, without animal exploitation. Over time, this would lead the textile industry to invest more into creating truly environmentally friendly and animal free products. 

Another way to reduce animal suffering and to limit waste from the textile industry, is to buy woollen items second-hand. There are endless ways to repurpose old and unwanted woollen items such as blankets, jumpers and scarves, and turn them into something new. Buying and reusing second-hand items in this way is inexpensive, eco-conscious and prevents further animal exploitation.

Animal Society’s Stance on Wool

At Animal Society, we oppose all forms of animal exploitation, including the wool trade. We are therefore campaigning to end the exploitation of sheep, goats, rabbits and alpacas. Until that happens, we are calling for strict regulations on woollen imports from non-EU countries and a ban on fabric linked to mulesing. The supply chains for these products must be made transparent. It must be made easier for consumers to trace the origin and production of woollen products.

FAQs

What is the difference between wool and virgin wool?

Wool is a collective term for animal fibres and may come from dead animals. Virgin wool, on the other hand, comes from a living animal. However, that does not mean that the animals did not have to suffer to produce this kind of wool.

Does wool always come from animals?

Traditionally, wool comes from animals. However, products of plant or synthetic origin may also be referred to as wool.

Is there such a thing as vegan wool?

There are plant-based and synthetic alternatives to animal wool. So examples include cotton, bamboo, Tencel, viscose and acrylic.

Sources

1 vgl. Counterstation (o. J.) Die verschiedenen Wollarten – Eigenschaften und Unterschiede. Verfügbar unter: counterstation.de (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
2 vgl. Haerlein (o.J.) Warum Schafe regelmäßig geschoren werden müssen. Verfügbar unter: https://www.haerlein.de/warum-schafe-regelmasig-d-h-mindestens-einmal-jahrlich-geschoren-werden-mussen-und-warum-ansonsten/ (Zugriff: 03 Juni 2026)
3 vgl. Zeitfäden (o. J.) Prozess der Wollgewinnung: Von der Schafschur bis zum fertigen Garn. Verfügbar unter: zeitfaeden.de (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
4 vgl. Tierchenwelt (o. J.) Schaf – Steckbrief, Lebensweise und Merkmale. Verfügbar unter: tierchenwelt.de (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
5 vgl. WorldAtlas (2024) The World’s Top Wool Producing Countries. Verfügbar unter: worldatlas.com (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
6 vgl. IndexBox (o. J.) Greasy Wool Market. Verfügbar unter: indexbox.io (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
7 vgl. Utopia (2024) Alpaka-Wolle: Besonderheiten, Verwendung und Kritik. Verfügbar u—-nter: utopia.de (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
8 vgl. Grand View Research (o. J.) Alpaca Fiber Market Size, Share & Trends Report, 2019–2025. Verfügbar unter: grandviewresearch.com (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
9 vgl. ebd.
10 vgl. Herz für Tiere (o. J.) Kaschmirziege. Verfügbar unter: herz-fuer-tiere.de (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
11 vgl. Grand View Research (o. J.) Cashmere Clothing Market Size, Share & Trends Report (2026–2033). Verfügbar unter: grandviewresearch.com (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
12 vgl. Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) (2015) Soft Cashmere Is Hard on the Environment. Verfügbar unter: nrdc.org (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
13 vgl. G. Schneider (o. J.) Annual Cashmere Market Report. Verfügbar unter: gschneider.com (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
14 vgl. Britannica (o. J.) Mohair. Verfügbar unter: britannica.com (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
15 vgl. PETA Investigations (n.d.), Responsible Mohair, PETA. Available at: https://investigations.peta.org/responsible-mohair/ (Zugriff: 15 Juni 2026)
16 vgl. Utopia (2024) Mohair-Wolle: Besonderheiten und Kritik. Verfügbar unter: utopia.de (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
17 vgl. Markwardt, Emma (2024): Superwolle: Angora-Kaninchen und ihre wirtschaftliche Bedeutung. Wissenschaftskommunikation BIOS, Fakultät Biologie. Verfügbar unter: tu-dresden.de (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
18 vgl. Edler Zwirn (o. J.) Angorawolle: Herkunft, Eigenschaften, Nutzung, Preis & Tierschutz. Verfügbar unter: edlerzwirn.com (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
19 vgl. Markwardt, Emma (2024): Superwolle: Angora-Kaninchen und ihre wirtschaftliche Bedeutung. Wissenschaftskommunikation BIOS, Fakultät Biologie. Verfügbar unter: tu-dresden.de (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026).
20 vgl. Roelofs, Sanne (o.J.) Domestic Rabbit Welfare: Welfare Issues surrounding a multi-purpose animal. S. 57. Verfügbar unter: https://studenttheses.uu.nl/server/api/core/bitstreams/d3fa0f5e-746a-4ce6-b651-6f0af54b8954/content (Zugriff: 29.Mai 2026)
21 vgl. Bąkowska, M., Pilarczyk, R., Juszczak-Czasnojć, M., Seremak, B., Tomza-Marciniak, A., Kwita, E., Felska-Błaszczyk, L., & Pilarczyk, B. (2025). The Effect of Environment and Husbandry Practices on Sheep Welfare. Animals, 15(22), 3314. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15223314
22 vgl. Han, Chengquan et. al. (2024):Temporary sensory separation of lamb groups from ewes affects behaviors and serum levels of stress-related indicators of small-tailed Han lambs. Physiology & Behavior, 1114504(277).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114504
23 vgl. Positionspapier des Interdisciplinary Centre for Animal Welfare Research and 3R (ICAR3R): Angora, Kaschmir, Merino und Co. – Das versteckte Tierleid hinter den sogenannten „Edelwollen“. Verfügbar unter: https://www.uni-giessen.de/de/fbz/zentren/icar3r/positionspapiere-1/positionspapier_edelwollen_0724.pdf (Zugrif: 29. Mai 2026).
24 vgl. Carstens, Peter (2021): Mulesing: Warum Schafe für Wollpullover verstümmelt werden – und welche Alternativen es gibt. In: Geo Online, Verfügbar unter: https://www.geo.de/natur/nachhaltigkeit/mulesing-warum-schafe-fuer-wollpullover-verstuemmelt-werden-und-30378000.html (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026)
25 vgl. Thun, B. (2024), Alpakawolle – Infos zu Tierleid, Schur und Qualzucht, PETA Deutschland, 11 April. Verfügbar unter: hhttps://www.peta.de/themen/alpaka-wolle/ (Zugriff: 15 Juni 2026).
26 Kohl, T., Wurzinger, M., Gutierrez Reynoso, G.A. and Waiblinger, S. (2023), ‘Reactions of Alpacas to Shearing and Accompanying Procedures’, Small Ruminant Research, 219, 106885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2022.106885
27 vgl. Collective Fashion Justice: Alpaca Wool (o.J.). Verfügbar unter: https://www.collectivefashionjustice.org/alpaca-wool (Zugriff: 29. Mai 2026)
28 vgl. PETA (2019): Ziegen für Kaschmir mit Hammer erschlagen. Verfügbar unter: https://www.peta.de/neuigkeiten/kaschmir-china-mongolei/(Zugriff: 15. Juni 2026)
29 vgl. Pilarczyk, Renata et. al (2026). The Influence of Environmental Conditions and Husbandry Practices on Goat Welfare. In: Animals 2026, 16(5), 838; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16050838
30 vgl.  Positionspapier des Interdisciplinary Centre for Animal Welfare Research and 3R (ICAR3R): Angora, Kaschmir, Merino und Co. – Das versteckte Tierleid hinter den sogenannten „Edelwollen“. Verfügbar unter: https://www.uni-giessen.de/de/fbz/zentren/icar3r/positionspapiere-1/positionspapier_edelwollen_0724.pdf (Zugriff: 29.Mai 2026).
31 vgl.  Peta (o.J.): Angora Industry. Verfügbar unter: https://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-clothing/angora-industry/ (Zugriff: 29.Mai 2026)
32 ebd.
33 vgl.  Brock, Philippa et. al. (2013): Greenhouse gas emissions profile for 1 kg of wool produced in the Yass Region, New South Wales: A Life Cycle Assessment approach. In: Animal Production Science (53/6). https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12208
34 vgl. Regional Council Enironment Waikato (o.J.) Sheep dips, spray booths and footbaths. Verfügbar unter: https://www.waikatoregion.govt.nz/assets/WRC/Sheep-dips-factsheet.pdf (Zugriff: 29.Mai 2026).
35 vgl. Marrs, Robert et. a. (2020). Release from sheep-grazing appears to put some heart back into upland vegetation: A comparison of nutritional properties of plant species in long-term grazing experiments. In: Annals of Applied Biology 177(1). Verfügbar unter: https://research.aber.ac.uk/en/publications/release-from-sheep-grazing-appears-to-put-some-heart-back-into-up/ (Zugriff: 29.Mai 2026).
36 vgl. Cao, F., et al (2024), ‘Effects of grazing on grassland biomass and biodiversity: A global synthesis’, Field Crops Research, 306, 109204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109204
37 vgl. Jayalakshmi, I (2014) Environmental Issues in Scouring of Wool. In Journal of Environmental Nanotechnology (3/2) S. 173-181). https://doi.org/10.13074/jent.2014.03.143082
38 vgl. Hassan, Mohammad und Shao, Jian Zhong (2015). Chemical Processing of Wool: Sustainability Considerations. In: Key Engineering Materials (671). S. 32-39. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.671.32 S. 34.